No one from Pitchfork bothered confirming how this ended up happening. In all likelihood, Pavement scored more staff votes than any other band or artist but without 1 song towering over the rest. This makes sense as Pavement's legacy was a hugely impressive string of brilliant LPs and EPs, but without the type of songs that could easily have been huge on any format besides college radio and 120 Minutes. But I could understand Pitchfork's take on this whole thing.. Nirvana gets all the credit they deserve and more. But a "best of the 90's" list without Pavement is pretty much worthless. Albums-wise and career-wise, and considering they started in 1989 and ended in 2000 without sucking even a little, they ARE the band of the decade. And yet, they're usually at #4 or #5, but never #1. And fuck, they deserve it, so why the fuck not?
While certainly well intentioned, Pavement's #1 placing would have been much more well-received from readers had they chosen a different song. And despite its popularity, "Cut Your Hair" wouldn't have gotten the job done quite as well as what's probably their 2nd most popular favorite among critics lists, the accidental slow-motion explosion called "Summer Babe" which was re-recorded for their first LP Slanted And Enchanted, and is possibly the loudest song to combine all of their best attributes: They probably went to college after leaving their parents in the suburbs, so they understand what debt is like... They're just like us. They played and sang like they were drunk. When they rocked, they kicked so much ass. When they were sad, they were really, really sad. They were confident. The lyrics are so fucking cool, even though sometimes they were way too cryptic and and often probably about nothing.. "Ice baby, I saw your girlfriend, she's eating her fingers like they're just another meal.." Damn that shit's good.. but huh?! And of course, the catchy part where they repeat a bunch of phrases.. "Everytime I sit around I find I'm shot.." And the hi-hat in this rules as well..
"To be played at maximum volume."
No comments:
Post a Comment